Monday, October 5, 2009

Where the Uninsured Are

NPR has a map of the uninsured by congressional district and by state.

without health insurance by congressional district map

On the face of it, it looks like the usual, albeit paradoxical, story: areas that vote more Democratic, and which support a broader social safety net, have less need of one, since fewer people are uninsured in those areas; whereas Republican-leaning areas, where support is presumably greater for the status quo (the maintaining of which seems to be the Republican approach to health care), tend to have more uninsured. Unfortunately, this map doesn't do a good job of letting you see urban congressional districts, so the appearance of the map could be rather unrepresentative of the country as a whole, and especially of Democratic-leaning areas (many of which are in cities).

However, you can also see uninsured numbers by state, which reveals that of the 26 states (counting DC as a state for wishful thinking purposes) where the uninsured are less than 15%, 21 were won by Obama in 2008. And of the 13 states where the uninsured are more than 20%, 10 were won by McCain. (McCain won 7 of the 12 15-20% states.) That's a rather striking correlation, no?

Meanwhile, Nate Silver uses math n' stuff to create a map that projects support for the public option for every congressional district:

nate silver's public option support map

Based on a few polls in certain states and districts, Nate created a regression analysis to project what support across every district in the US would likely be, based on a few variables, including poverty rate and Obama's vote share in the district. He found that:
-- The public option is estimated to have plurality support in 291 of the 435 Congressional Districts nationwide, or almost exactly two-thirds.
-- The public option is estimated to have plurality support in 235 of 257 Democratic-held districts.
-- The public option is estimated to have plurality support in 34 of 52 Blue Dog - held districts, and has overall popularity of 51 percent in these districts versus 39 percent opposed.
By implication, the public option was favored in 56 of the 178 Republican-held districts. Nate breaks out the projected support numbers for every district in his post.

Thanks to Matt Osborne for that one.

53 comments:

  1. by definition Congressional districts are approximately equal pop so an ideal candidate for equal-area cartogram.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Where is the paradox?

    Couldn't it be that in Republican heavy areas, social misery factors such as these are highly concentrated among Democratic voters, while in Democratic areas, they are not?

    Because, say, Republicans in the south and west could give a toot about social welfare systems that only benefit their opponents, while Democrats in the northeast and midwest take care of their own with their majority status.

    Republicans, typically being married, employed, white, middle to upper-middle class family people would be very unlikely to need social welfare programs. Therefore, as a minority in the northeast and midwest, a political situation with higher social welfare spending has little effect on them, while in the south and west, they can create a political situation where a low tax regime does not permit vast spending on the rather larger number of poor Democrat constiuencies (blacks and hispanics).

    Keep in mind that down south, white voters, while only about 60-70% of the electorate, vote up to 5 or 10 to 1 Republican. The social pathologies frequently chronicles on this site as affecting the Republican south are inordinately concentrated in the minority black and hispanic populations, two populations that are almost non-existant in many Democratic states like Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Maine, Wisconsin, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  3. So in the South the Republican majority "doesn't give a toot" about the social misery of their neighbors (who are Democrats), but in other parts of the country the Democratic majority "looks after its own" by supporting a strong safety net? But that doesn't explain anything. Why don't non-Southern whites lean Republican in the same proportions as southern whites? Or why aren't southern whites more concerned for the social welfare of non-whites? The question is why southern whites vote Republican in the first place.

    (And note that in the West, the Democrats are plenty competitive in most of the areas that have high rates of uninsured.)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Seems that the answer is because in the South, political affiliation/goals/motives are divided on racial lines while elsewhere, they are not.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Your blog is very much good. I am very much impressed by your blog content ........

    ReplyDelete
  6. I really liked the post and the stories are really thanks for sharing the informative post.


    retweezers|Kaos Couple

    ReplyDelete
  7. I've bookmarked this page for future reference, thanks..... :)


    Visit My Wordpress Journey= travel guide

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks for the article, this site really enriches me ...






    us trends

    ReplyDelete
  9. I love the article on this site. Thanks for sharing,.... good site. May be next time i always visit



    dofollow social bookmark

    ReplyDelete
  10. I like the news contained in this site, ... tomorrow I will visit again ...




    Bluetooth Headphones

    ReplyDelete
  11. nice mapp.... very usefulll ^_^

    hopelineannabel larsen

    ReplyDelete
  12. Very informative and trustworthy blog. Please keep updating with great posts like this one. I have booked marked your site and am about to email it to a few friends of mine that I know would enjoy reading
    sesli sohbet sesli chat sesli sohbet sesli chat

    ReplyDelete
  13. I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I think I will leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.
    http://www.factspenisenlargement.com

    ReplyDelete
  14. your wesbite good, I enjoyed visiting here ....

    ReplyDelete
  15. You definitely put a new spin on a subject thats been written about for years. Great stuff, just great!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Very useful information, thanks so much for the post.

    ReplyDelete
  17. To my mind one and all ought to look at this.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I think people fear idea management and innovation because there's a significant number of ideas that simply won't plan out.......Nice statement.....keep posting

    ReplyDelete
  19. this day I've been searching for information on various issues, this I found very good and I would like to congratulate you for your work.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I think that this post is one of the best that i have read in my life, congrats you did a great job,.

    ReplyDelete
  21. the difference between the content spammers and most corporate innovators is that the smaller

    ReplyDelete
  22. I'm writing to you because I just came across a business that I think has great potential. It lets you save money on almost everything. Make money from almost everything,

    ReplyDelete
  23. If growth is important to a firm, and if growth is dependent on offering existing products and services to new customers

    ReplyDelete
  24. innovation is very natural and happens in the "real world" as new plants and animals colonize new ecological niches.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I wonder how you got so good. This is really a fascinating blog, lots of stuff that I can get into. One thing I just want to say is that your Blog is so perfect

    ReplyDelete
  26. We generally think most specifically about the risk associated with a new product introduction

    ReplyDelete
  27. I would be aware that as somebody who really doesn’t comment to blogs a lot (in actual fact, this may be my first put up), I don’t think the time period “lurker” is very flattering to a non-posting reader.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I think people fear idea management and innovation because there's a significant number of ideas that simply won't plan out.......Nice statement.....keep posting

    ReplyDelete
  29. this day I've been searching for information on various issues, this I found very good and I would like to congratulate you for your work.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I think that this post is one of the best that i have read in my life, congrats you did a great job,.

    ReplyDelete
  31. the difference between the content spammers and most corporate innovators is that the smaller

    ReplyDelete
  32. I'm writing to you because I just came across a business that I think has great potential. It lets you save money on almost everything. Make money from almost everything,

    ReplyDelete
  33. If growth is important to a firm, and if growth is dependent on offering existing products and services to new customers

    ReplyDelete
  34. innovation is very natural and happens in the "real world" as new plants and animals colonize new ecological niches.

    ReplyDelete
  35. I wonder how you got so good. This is really a fascinating blog, lots of stuff that I can get into. One thing I just want to say is that your Blog is so perfect

    ReplyDelete
  36. We generally think most specifically about the risk associated with a new product introduction

    ReplyDelete
  37. I would be aware that as somebody who really doesn’t comment to blogs a lot (in actual fact, this may be my first put up), I don’t think the time period “lurker” is very flattering to a non-posting reader.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Good writing and interesting to note, also visit the website jasa fotocopy murah I take care of that today. Thank you,

    ReplyDelete
  39. Thank you for your very nice article, do not forget to read my articles also
    hadirkanlah
    kata kata cinta
    status fb lucu
    wallpaper keren
    kata kata lucu
    kata kata galau
    and many other interesting articles on my blog that.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Thanks for sharing please help of my website Downpipes
    Thanks for sharing please help of my websiteLeafguard

    ReplyDelete