Thursday, February 12, 2009

Visualizing Segregation



That Mondrianesque image on the right there is, believe it or not, a sort of "map." It comes from some folks at Dartmouth who were interested in studying patterns of segregation in cities - not Jim Crow-era forced segregation, but the de facto kind that exists today in most American cities, where the phenomena of "black" neighborhoods and "white" neighborhoods are common. This map is going to need a bit of explaining, but bear with me, because I think it's really interesting.

The map is of a simulated city of "reds" and "blues." As the site describes it:
This segregation applet simulates the movement of people between houses within a "city." The city is divided into 10 x 10 "tracts" which are in turn divided into a grid of smaller squares. Each small square in the city represents a house that can be vacant (white) or occupied by a red or blue or, in three-color mode, a green square.
So the whole grid represents a city made up of people of two races. By pressing the start button on the applet you can set time in motion and let people move around, just as they do in real cities.

However, they're not moving around randomly. See those little boxes on the left that say "minimum # of like neighbors" and "maximum # of unlike neighbors"? Those determine where a given "family" will move to. In the image above there are no preferences, so any family will move anywhere. When you set time in motion, there will just be random movement of blues and reds around the grid. But suppose we change the settings to this:

Now we've set it so that a red family will only move to a neighborhood where it has a minimum of 4 red neighbors and a maximum of 6 blue neighbors; likewise, a blue family will only move to a neighborhood that has a minimum of 4 blue neighbors and a maximum of 6 red neighbors. And what's the result? After about 2,000 "moves," we get a city that looks something like this:

Now almost everyone in the city lives in a neighborhood that is completely homogeneous. This is sort of remarkable: remember, it's not the individual preference of anyone in this city to live in an all-red or all-blue neighborhood; everyone just wants to live in an area where at least half of the neighbors are the same race as themselves. But the end result is that nearly everyone ends up living in an almost totally segregated neighborhood.

Here's another scenario. In this case, the preferences are set quite liberally: every red only wants to have at least 2 red neighbors and no more than 6 blue neighbors, and every blue wants at least 2 blue neighbors and no more than 6 red neighbors. In this case, you can imagine, we have a city with low levels of racism and racial resentment and fear, but people just want to feel like they have at least a couple of neighbors who come from a similar culture or background as themselves. And here's what happens:

Shocking, right? Even though we've posited a city with very little racial animus, and just a seemingly reasonable desire of most people to feel like they share a similar identity or culture or background with just a couple of their neighbors, we still end up with a city where most people live in a generally homogeneous neighborhood. It's a fascinating result. There's a bit more mixing than in the scenario above, but still not as much as you might expect; maybe this comes closest to resembling an actual typical American city.

On one hand, this is sort of reassuring. It means that, even though many cities are still quite segregated, even in the 21st century, that doesn't mean different races are irreconcilably hostile towards each other; people just have a reasonable desire to be around at least a few people similar to themselves. On the other hand, if the end result of this desire is such a significant degree of segregation, then the odds that people would become more comfortable with other races through familiarity with them would seem not to improve over time.

By the way, the site also provides specific stats - those "segregation indices" on the left - for the more quantificationally adept (though that ain't me). You can also play around with different scenarios by changing the relative population sizes of the reds and blues, adding a third race ("greens"), or even instituting 1950s-style policies of restricting races from a particular area. For a certain sort of brain, it can be a bit addictive.

17 comments:

K H D and sometimes T said...

Wow. I've always suspected something like this. I feel a little better about myself and a little worried about the world. Now, let's see one that incorporates the effects of gentrification on a neighborhood.

Chachy said...

Yeah, and what gentrification in the sense you're talking about would require would be at least a few people who just don't give a crap about being surrounded by people of another race. In other words, to model that, you'd need to model a diversity of sensitivies to neighbors' races, which is something this model doesn't do (and which of course would be more true to life). I wonder how much of a difference that would make in the final outcome.

Anonymous said...

nowGoogle.com adalah Multiple Search Engine Popular | Ragam Bengkulu | nowGoogle.com adalah Multiple Search Engine Popular |Marlina.edu | nowGoogle.com adalah Multiple Search Engine Popular | Fitri Xanga | nowGoogle.com adalah Multiple Search Engine Popular | Sponges Bob | nowGoogle.com adalah Multiple Search Engine Popular | Keblinger | nowGoogle.com adalah Multiple Search Engine Popular | Bongo Bloggr | nowGoogle.com adalah Multiple Search Engine Popular | Tapak Jedah | nowGoogle.com adalah Multiple Search Engine Popular | Simpang Tigo | nowGoogle.com adalah Multiple Search Engine Popular | Kebun Kenanga | nowGoogle.com adalah Multiple Search Engine Popular

Anonymous said...

nowGoogle.com adalah Multiple Search Engine PopularnowGoogle.com adalah Multiple Search Engine PopularnowGoogle.com adalah Multiple Search Engine PopularnowGoogle.com adalah Multiple Search Engine PopularnowGoogle.com adalah Multiple Search Engine PopularnowGoogle.com adalah Multiple Search Engine PopularnowGoogle.com adalah Multiple Search Engine PopularnowGoogle.com adalah Multiple Search Engine PopularTEKNIK MILENIAteknik milenia
SIGN UP WEBweb 12.06DEPRESSION MANAGEDepressionmanageHEALTH WITH FITNESSfitness manageWEIGHT LOSS IDEALweight loss idealSKIN MANAGEskin care manageANIMAL LOVERanimal loverBEAUTY LIKE DIAMONDbeauty like diamondBACKYARD BLOGbackyard blogDO MORE WITH UR HOBBYdo more with your hobbyEMAIL ON THE MARKETemail on the marketLEARN EBAYlearn ebayLEARN SEOlearn SEOBERITA ARTIS INDOberita artis indoOpt-In List Blog opt in list blogSYSTEM PC INFOsystem PC infoMODIFICATION PHONEmodfication phoneGO ENTERPRENEURgo enterpreneurLive Journal Bloglive journal blogXANGA BLOGxanga blogBUDAYA WISATA BENGKULUbudaya wisata bengkuluMY PAPER
BLOG TIARAblog tiaraANAK CANTIKanak cantikINFORMATIKAHOLICinformatikaholicMODIF CELLmodif cell reviewINTISARI INFOintisari info

Anonymous said...

Find elsewhere how with the purpose of carry out a reverse cell phone search or reverse phone lookup a mobile phone lookup before yet a cell phone number search lookup to facilitate unearth away who is behind that individual to has been calling you this entire point in time ok.

Anonymous said...

I enjoy this nice repeal cellular phone search or mobile phone search otherwise cell phone number lookup spot. I can understand a distinguished amount of cell phone lookup stuff about switch mobile phone search here now whilst I checked not by home this guide here.

Anonymous said...

reverse cell phone lookup

reverse address lookup

cell phone directory

phone number search

free people search

criminal background check

reverse phone lookup

reverse phone lookup

album foto said...

I think people fear idea management and innovation because there's a significant number of ideas that simply won't plan out.......Nice statement.....keep posting

asuransi pendidikan said...

this day I've been searching for information on various issues, this I found very good and I would like to congratulate you for your work.

design interior jakarta said...

I think that this post is one of the best that i have read in my life, congrats you did a great job,.

perusahaan security said...

the difference between the content spammers and most corporate innovators is that the smaller

jual wine said...

I'm writing to you because I just came across a business that I think has great potential. It lets you save money on almost everything. Make money from almost everything,

coklat valentine said...

If growth is important to a firm, and if growth is dependent on offering existing products and services to new customers

belajar internet marketing said...

innovation is very natural and happens in the "real world" as new plants and animals colonize new ecological niches.

kuliner bandung said...

I wonder how you got so good. This is really a fascinating blog, lots of stuff that I can get into. One thing I just want to say is that your Blog is so perfect

konsultan perusahaan said...

We generally think most specifically about the risk associated with a new product introduction

how to stay erect said...

I would be aware that as somebody who really doesn’t comment to blogs a lot (in actual fact, this may be my first put up), I don’t think the time period “lurker” is very flattering to a non-posting reader.